dan and i spent the day at a learning co-op today.. i have lots of thoughts and questions, am still digesting and mulling..
but briefly;
first, wow, a group of children all different ages interacting together? simply awesome, so obviously the way things are meant to be. the younger ones learning from and mimicking the older ones (in dan's case, literally and openly and comically); the older ones nurturing and caring for the younger ones, being mindful of their limitations, and carefully and thoughtfully including them in their play, adapting the play to suit everyone.
and the social stuff.. eg bullying or anti social or hurtful behaviours. the group of parents are fully present in the children's environment, and therefore are to-the-minute aware of what's going on. they're also very involved with the children throughout the day, often one-on-one. and most parents have been / will be so for years, the entire duration of the child's time at the co-op, often more (10, 14 years often.. a time even spanning their siblings' time at the co-op too!). plus, parents meet once a week, and therefore are well acquainted with the ins and outs of each child's life at home and at the co-op.
to me, that's places the adults perfectly to deal with any social issues that arise between the children.. contrast that with a large school, 30 students to one teacher at a time, who only sees each group of children for a few periods a day.. even if a teacher was made aware of bullying for example, how could she reasonably be equipped to deal with such a complex issue?
on the flip side, though;
granted i was only there for one day, and didn't really ask about the"curriculum"; but i was expecting something more like this:
http://mominmadison.blogspot.com/
i was hoping to see children reading, working on science projects they had come up with, cooking and eating together, ongoing gardening projects, art projects and displays, musical instruments...
is this an unrealistic unschooling expectation?
what i saw was cool, but i confess i was hoping for more. but ah, i know it's just one day in the life of. probably over the course of months, the amount and variety of projects and activities made available to any one child would be pretty dazzling.
what was really of interest to me were the boys.. they mostly moved in a group, the odd loner. they played / watched a chess game on computer, and then they played this really rambunctious fighting game (a jumpy sort of wrestling). this was really interesting to me, as dandan was dumbstruck by fascination by this activity, and stood there for ages holding my hand, wanting to join in.
at first i was a bit horrified by the rambunctiousness and loudness, and what seemed and sounded like aggression.
but then i saw that, whenever someone expressed hurt, the game would instantly stop, and the leader of the game would tend to the injured one, ascertaining if he was alright, and then trying to cheer him up, taking as long as they needed before the game would continue.
and i also saw that as rough as they were, and as tight and real as the strangleholds were, no one was angry, no blow was intended to injure or hurt... the direct opposite of so many similar childhood games i've witnessed / been in before. very significant.
they really seemed to just be playing out a world where they were warriors, or perfecting their moves in preparation for warriorhood. i think i'd be okay with my little boy doing this..
and then the (male) co-ordinator came out (obviously hearing the escalating blood curdling shrieks), and suggested a game, an athletic rolling competition, which they took to eagerly.
dandan has made me very aware of the nature of male mentorship and role modelling, how a boy is naturally drawn to an older boy / man to follow and mimic, in preparation for manhood; and how groups of males naturally fall into a hierarchy and seek a leader (or, if they're all the same age and there is no intrinsic hierarchy, will fight until one is established), man or wolves alike in this.
so it was very cool to see this in action today..
after all, it's all about balance. there is usually plenty of input from at least one woman into a child's daily life; but usually much less from a man, if any at all.
plus, i read somewhere that boys learn best in a one to one mentorship arrangement with an older male.
which makes me add to the mental checklist of what i want for dan's education (be it home unschooling, an unschooling school, or some sort of conventional school): some amount of teaching input from a man.
obviously the gender question is irrelevant for home unschooling (his learning environment naturally being tailored to him specifically), but it does come up when considering a group learning environment, no matter how unschooly..
but boy, was it cool watching him follow all the older kids around and be part of things all day. unless this is just me projecting onto him all my self-criticisms about being such a loner by choice or circumstance?
i can imagine us home unschooling, and it seems so wonderful and cool (right now i'm picturing this blog again (http://mominmadison.blogspot.com), and soulemama's blog, just to name the first two that come to mind.
but i can also imagine endless days of dan running around the co-op and being, daily, part of a group of children, and that seems incredibly cool as well..
so, okay, projecting again, but the latter is everything i ever wanted for myself, longed for even, as the pattern of my life seems to have been my feeling ever on the fringe of things. to belong, to be woven into a group of people, to have someone already there as soon as you even felt you could do with company).
whereas the home unschooling picture is the life i always had (minus the parent anyway, and outside of our short school hours), and always felt very isolated in.. (then again, i am an introvert, i probably would have chosen it anyway?)
okay, going in circles now. i'll let this decision marinate some more over the next few years. in the meantime, this co-op rocks!